Trump says US ‘needs’ Greenland ahead of Vance’s meeting with Denmark – Former President Donald Trump has once again rekindled an unusual but perennial geopolitical debate: whether the United States should buy Greenland. Speaking to supporters ahead of a high-level diplomatic meeting between Vice President J.D. Vance and Danish officials, Trump said bluntly that the U.S. “needs” Greenland—reviving a proposal that many once dismissed as a curiosity but now sits at the intersection of global security, climate change, and great-power competition. Trump says US ‘needs’ Greenland ahead of Vance’s meeting with Denmark
Trump’s remarks came as Vance prepared to meet with Denmark’s leadership to discuss defense cooperation, Arctic security, and NATO priorities. While the discussion was not technically about Greenland’s ownership, Trump’s words ensured the enormous Arctic island would once again dominate headlines—and strain relations with Copenhagen. “We need Greenland,” Trump declared. “It’s very important for national security, for defense, for the future.” He portrayed the matter not as a real estate transaction, but as a strategic imperative in a fast changing world. Trump says US ‘needs’ Greenland ahead of Vance’s meeting with Denmark
Greenland, an autonomous province within the Kingdom of Denmark, is the world’s biggest island and occupies a critical position between North America and Europe. It sits astride critical Arctic trade lanes and hosts the U.S. military’s Pituffik Space Base (originally Thule Air Base), a vital component of America’s missile-warning and space-surveillance network. As Arctic ice melts and new sea lanes develop, the island’s geopolitical worth has only grown.
Trump first broached the notion of buying Greenland during his administration in 2019, taking allies off guard and sparking strong opposition from Danish and Greenlandic authorities alike. Denmark’s prime minister at the time labeled the plan “absurd,” while Greenland’s administration reiterated that the region was “not for sale.” Trump retaliated by canceling a scheduled state visit to Denmark, turning what might have been a diplomatic footnote into a full-blown crisis.
Now, years later, Trump’s revived rhetoric implies the idea never fully went away.
Supporters of Trump’s stance believe that the global scene has altered dramatically since 2019. Russia has extended its Arctic military presence, China has declared itself a “near-Arctic state,” and rivalry for rare earth minerals—many of which are believed to exist beneath Greenland’s ice—has risen. From this perspective, Trump’s direct presentation resonates with those who perceive geopolitics as a zero-sum game.
“Other countries are moving fast up there,” Trump added. “We can’t afford to fall behind.”
Yet critics fear that Trump’s approach risks oversimplifying a complex relationship and upsetting key allies. Denmark is a founding NATO member, and Greenlanders have often stated their desire for greater autonomy—if not eventual independence—rather than absorption into another nation. Trump says US ‘needs’ Greenland ahead of Vance’s meeting with Denmark 
Danish officials were keen to underline that Greenland’s status was not on the agenda. “Greenland belongs to the Greenlandic people,” a Danish government official said ahead of Vance’s arrival. “Our cooperation with the United States is strong, but sovereignty is not negotiable.”
For Greenland’s leaders, Trump’s words resurrect unsettling memories of being discussed as an asset rather than a people. The island’s population of around 56,000—many of them Inuit—has increasingly stressed self-determination, economic development, and environmental conservation. Climate change has brought both opportunity and existential risk, melting ice that exposes resources while threatening traditional ways of existence. Trump says US ‘needs’ Greenland ahead of Vance’s meeting with Denmark
Vice President Vance’s meeting with Danish officials is anticipated to focus on improving Arctic cooperation rather than discussing Trump’s plan directly. U.S. officials have underscored that Washington respects Greenland’s autonomy and Denmark’s sovereignty, even as it seeks stronger coordination on security and infrastructure. Still, Trump’s statements linger over the discussions, creating political pressure and public expectations that neither party may want to confront directly.
Analysts observe that Trump’s approach mirrors his broader worldview—one that stresses concrete control, leverage, and transactional diplomacy. Where traditional policymakers emphasize alliances and rules, Trump typically speaks in terms of ownership and necessity. “Trump isn’t talking like a diplomat,” said one former U.S. official acquainted with Arctic policy. “He’s talking like a dealmaker who sees geography as destiny.” Trump says US ‘needs’ Greenland ahead of Vance’s meeting with Denmark
That framing may connect with portions of the American electorate, especially as concerns mount about China’s global reach and Russia’s aggression. But it also complicates the task of diplomats like Vance, who must convince allies that U.S. aspirations do not come at the expense of confidence.
Whether Trump’s words represent a serious policy drive or simply rhetorical posture remains unclear. He is no longer in power, but his influence over Republican foreign policy—and over the national conversation—remains considerable. Each time he revisits Greenland, he challenges allies and rivals alike to address unpleasant questions about the future of the Arctic.
For now, Greenland is not shifting hands. But as ice continues to melt and global competition heats up, the island’s value will only grow. Trump’s insistence that the U.S. “needs” Greenland may sound confrontational, even ludicrous, but it taps into a real and increasing debate about power, security, and influence at the top of the world. As Vance sits down with Danish officials, the goal will be to manage those realities without reviving old wounds—while ensuring that cooperation, rather than confrontation, defines the Arctic’s future. Trump says US ‘needs’ Greenland ahead of Vance’s meeting with Denmark
About the Author
